Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 80. 2006.

 

New Delhi, India

Indian Agricultural Research Institute

 

Heritability and correlation studies in sweet corn for quality traits, field emergence and grain yield

--Kumari, J; Gadag, RN; Jha, GK

 

       Ten sweet corn and seven field corn genotypes were studied for estimating components of genetic variance and combining ability for ear-related and biochemical traits using diallel and Òline-X-testerÓ mating designs.  The study was carried out at the Division of Genetics and Division of Environmental Science, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, during 2003-2004.  Diallel crosses were made among six inbred lines, including three each of sugary and shrunken genotypes, while in later crosses seven field corn inbreds were crossed as female lines with four sweet corn inbreds as tester parents.  The details regarding pedigree, source of origin and endosperm mutants are given in Table 1.

       Analyses of variance by diallel shows the mean sum of squares is highly significant for all nine traits except reducing sugar (Table 2).  In the line-X-tester analysis (Table 3), parents as a whole are significant at 1% for all characters, while the partitioned source of variance for female parents indicated significance for starch, carbohydrate, grain weight, field emergence and TSS.  This meant that field corn lines have significant variability for these traits while significant for sugar components and phytoglycogen.  As far as male parents or sugary lines are concerned, these were significant for all sugar components, phytoglycogen and total carbohydrate components.  As it is well known that field and sweet corn populations are genotypically and phenotypically different, the female vs. male source of variation is significant for all traits.  Simi-
Table 1.  Pedigree and source of origin of inbred lines.

 

Inbreds

(Code #)

Pedigree

Source population

Endosperm mutation

DMB321

IPA40-f-17-1-1-4-1-1-1-f

AD-609

Normal

DMB322

TCA-22-3-1-1-2-f-#-f-1-1

A-64

Normal

DMB323

IPA-1-f-16-2-#-f-1

A-64

Normal

DMB324

IPA-34-5-f-1-1

MDR-1

Normal

DMB325

PC2HS-31-f

PC2composite

Normal

DMB326

IPA-3-6-10-3-1-1-1-2-1

A-64

Normal

DMB327

TCA-21-1-b-1-1-1-3-1

AD-609

Normal

SCI301

SCMD90 (01R)-2-1-3-1

Madhuri

su

SCI302

SCMD90 (01R)-3-1-2-1

Madhuri

su

SCI303

SCMD90 (01R)- 4-2-1-2

Madhuri

su

SCI304

SCMD90 (01R)- 4-3-2-1

Madhuri

su

SCI305

SCMD90 (01R)-5-4-1-1

Madhuri

su

SCI306

SCPRHY85 (01R)-2-1-2-3

SOOK SH137

sh

SCI307

SCPRHY85 (01R)-6-3-1-2

SOOK SH137

sh

SCI308

SCPRHY85 (01R)-7-3-2-1

SOOK SH137

sh

SCI309

SCPRHY90 (01R)-2-2-1-2

SOOK SH138

sh

SCI310

SCPRHY90 (01R)-3-1-3-1

SOOK SH138

sh

 

larly, hybrid and parent vs. hybrid mean sum of squares are significant for most of the traits.  This suggests the utilization of non-sweet germplasm in the improvement of sugary genotypes through hybridization and introgression, followed by backcrossing for characters such as field emergence, plant stand and yield.

       The correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the degree of association of characters among the kernel quality components total soluble solids (TSS), grain yield and field emergence.  Phenotypic correlations were computed using the formula given below.  Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated using inbred line means from replicated trials of diallel and line-X-tester analysis using the SPSS 10.0 package.

     

Where,   

rp

= Phenotypic correlation       

Cov (XY) p

= Phenotypic covariance between the characters X and Y

X2p and Y2p

= Phenotypic variance of the characters X and Y, respectively

Phenotypic correlation coefficients were compared against ÔrÕ values at (n-2) d.f. at the probability levels of 0.05 and 0.01 to test their significance.  The results of correlation analysis for the traits studied in this experiment  are presented in Table 4.

       The main objective associated with this study was to understand the relationship between field emergence, grain weight and kernel quality traits, including total soluble solids (TSS).  The correlation analysis revealed that total sugar is positively correlated with reducing sugar and non-reducing sugar with a high level of significance (p< 0.001).  Phytoglycogen and total soluble solids had significant correlation with total sugar, with p values equal to 0.011 and 0.007, respectively.  However it had negative significant correlation with starch, carbohydrate, grain weight and field emergence.  The same trend was exhibited by reducing sugar as well as non-reducing sugar.  Starch concentration in dry mature kernels was most highly correlated with total carbohydrate (r = 0.78), followed by field emergence (r = 0.69) and grain weight (r = 0.52) while it was negatively correlated with all other characters.  The phytoglycogen content had a highly negative correlation coefficient with


 

Table 2.  Analysis of variance for diallel.

 

Source

d.f.

Mean sum of squares

Total sugar (%)

Reducing sugar (%)

Non-reducing sugar (%)

Total Starch (%)

Phytoglycogen (%)

Total carbohydrate (%)

Grain weight

Field emergence

Total soluble solids (TSS)

Replication

2

0.48

0.087

0.54

22.01

0.47

29.09

30.96

44.92

0.29

Treatment

20

14.04**

0.34

11.22**

209.24**

89.87**

89.38**

9.68**

236.54**

3.13**

Error

40

1.68

1.58

1.65

22.06

0.50

26.07

3.78

14.17

1.11

* and ** indicate significance level at 1% and 5 % respectively.

 

Table 3.  ANOVA for parents and hybrids (biochemical traits) in line-X-tester.

 

Source

d.f.

Mean sum of squares

Total sugar (%)

Reducing sugar (%)

Non-reducing sugar (%)

Total Starch (%)

Phytoglycogen (%)

Total carbohydrate (%)

Grain weight

Field emergence (%)

Total soluble solids (TSS)

Replication

2

2.25

0.77

5.09

136.81

0.04

103.79

5.03

37.27

0.29

Parents

10

51.37**

2.18**

33.86**

516.53**

117.66**

132.07**

50.13 **

335.60**

3.13**

Females

6

0.61

0.16

0.29

120.24**

0.032

117.83**

29.20 **

407.19**

3.07**

Males

3

27.13**

0.35*

24.17**

10.54

165.21*

76.13*

16.33

141.60

1.14

Females vs. Males

1

428.67**

19.76**

264.35**

4412.31**

680.83**

385.35**

277.09 **

488.08**

9.44**

Hybrids

27

12.23**

0.97**

13.80**

240.10**

7.78**

198.37**

28.77 **

173.89**

0.76

Parents vs. hybrids

1

773.98**

37.18**

471.93**

378.42**

83.81**

0.64

5.37

8713.50**

117.87**

Error

76

2.10

0.09

2.15

31.60

0.37

27.57

6.53

79.61

1.11

* and ** indicate significance level at 1% and 5%, respectively.

 

Table 4.  Correlation coefficients among kernel characteristics, yield and field emergence.

 

 

TS

RS

NRS

ST

PH

TC

GW

FE

TSS

Total sugar (TS)

1.00

0.89

0.99**

-0.81**

0.43*

-0.54**

-0.49*

-0.28

0.46*

Reducing sugar (RS)

 

1.00

0.84**

-0.82**

0.61**

-0.47*

-0.64**

-0.34

0.50*

Non-reducing sugar (NRS)

 

 

1.00

-0.78**

0.37

-0.54**

-0.44*

-0.25

0.43*

Total starch (ST)

 

 

 

1.00

-0.67**

0.78**

0.51**

0.69**

-0.30

Phytoglycogen (PH)

 

 

 

 

1.00

-0.13

-0.67**

-0.28

0.19

Total Carbohydrate (TC)

 

 

 

 

 

1.00

0.94**

-0.05

-0.13

Grain Weight (GW)

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.00

0.54**

-0.35

Field Emergence (FE)